Emile Durkheim vs. Karl Marx - 1689 Words

------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- Emile Durkheim vs. Karl Marx Durkheim vs. Marx Introduction: For so many years, authorities from each field have deliberated normative theories to explain what holds the society together. Almost each specialist, from structural functionalism, positivism and conflict theory perspective, had contributed their works trying to illustrate main problematic to our society. In one way, one of the Emile Durkheim’s famous work is â€Å"division of labor† which was primarily focusing on how the society could maintain their â€Å"integrity and coherence† in this modern society, when the power of boundary from religious and moral standards have no longer be†¦show more content†¦Though terms such as â€Å"Bourgeoisie† and â€Å"Proletariat† are difficult to remember, they are just words to identify two classes- capitalist and worker. According to Ritzer, as a conflict theorist, Marx categorized alienation into four particular types. First of all, labors in capitalist society are alienated from their â€Å"prod uctive activity†. It simply means workers do not produce items based on their needs or ideas. They are just simply following instructions, instead of creating or directly satisfying their own needs. For example, worker A needs some wheat and corn to feed himself and his family, instead of going to grow corn by himself, he choose to go working for the capitalist, get pay-check, and buy the wheat and corn in a super-store. In other words, the Capitalist gains control of the worker. Secondly, in capitalist society, labors are alienated from the product. It means workers produced products that completely belong to the capitalists, no matter how desperate the worker needs. For example, there was a comic picture on newspaper about a story that a worker worked for a bakery factory starving for death. Thirdly, workers in capitalist society are alienated from their associates. According to Marx, capitalists assume that cooperation in capitalism is disrupted, therefore they requires â⠂¬Å"less talk, more work† as principal in capitalism work place. Finally, labors in capitalist society are alienated from their own human potential, which means at work place inShow MoreRelatedEssay about Emile Durkheim vs Karl Marx1216 Words   |  5 Pagestime in history, social theorists like Emile Durkheim and Karl Marx challenged the aspect of social structure in their works. Emile Durkheim is known as a functionalist states that everything serves a function in society and his main concern to discover what that function was. On the other hand Karl Marx, a conflict theorist, stresses that society is a complex system characterized by inequality and conflict that generate social change. Both Durkheim and Marx were concerned with the characteristicsRead MoreDurkheim Vs. Marx s Theory Of Law And Punishment1859 Words   |  8 PagesDurkheim vs. Marx Defining law can be difficult to do since its definition varies among various people. Many people see law as standards for human behavior that reflect the deepest values and morals of the society. Others see law as a game which acts as a set of guidelines for settling disagreements in a nonviolent way. From a sociologist’s perspective law is viewed as a behavioral system with the two aspects of roles/hierarchy and rules/discretion. Not only is law thought of as a behavioral systemRead MoreWho Are Sociologists And What Influences They Have Had?1079 Words   |  5 PagesWho are sociologists and what influences they have had? In this paper, we will discuss four sociologists: Karl Marx, Max Weber, Emile Durkheim and George Mead. They are all well-known and influential thinkers of their time who have greatly contributed to the current sociological approaches and studies. They differ in their theories, but all of them have a common goal to uncover the structural and social foundati on of the society. What is society? How does it function? What drives the societal changeRead MoreThe Issue Of The United States Charter Of Rights And Freedoms1648 Words   |  7 Pagesinequalities for the slavery debate. Hence, the arguments put forth will be that the evidence for the existence of slavery is sufficient, however, through the abolition of slavery and the reasons for engaging in certain types of theories by Karl Marx and Emile Durkheim, the moral and emotional discussion fabric connotes the economic salutation. Therefore, the purposes of this paper will cover the following. Firstly, it will provide clarity for the definition of racism and slavery. Secondly, it willRead MoreFunctionalist And Conflict Paradigm Of The Role Schooling And Education1580 Words   |  7 Pagesvalues, role allocation and meritocracy. We have social solidarity when we feel like we are part of something bigger. (Katie, 2015)† Schools make us feel like we are part of something that i s huge as Durkheim claimed†. It does that through the teachings of subjects like history and English. Durkheim noted that at school, individuals learn the diverse skills necessary for work for example Learners start doing same subjects but later on they specialize on something different. Talcott Parsons arguedRead MoreSocial Institutions And Its Impact On Society1602 Words   |  7 Pagesadvancing cultures through knowledge and of helping to prevent socio-economic inequalities by breaking through the boundaries of human ignorance and fear (Palmer, 2008). The functionalist perspective is based on the works of Herbert Spencer, Emile Durkheim, Talcott Parsons, and Robert Merton. Functionalism perspective considers a society as a system of parts that work in harmony together. Each part contributes to the stability of society, which helps to maintain the balance within. The parts withinRead MoreHuman And Non Human Animals1791 Words   |  8 Pagespaper presents the view that because animals are considered to be chattel property, various morally-acceptable values play pivotal roles in ensuring the sustenance of harmony between human and non-human existence. Emile Durkheim - The Natural Insatiability One of the ways in which Durkheim explains the difference between human beings and nature (non-human animals), regards how he characterizes the innate morality of human nature. Although his early thoughts emphasized the social nature of human beingsRead MoreThe Theory Of Knowledge Is Power2243 Words   |  9 Pagesimpossible. A second manner to achieve social change is through Conflict Theory. Conflict Theory suggests that individuals and groups (social classes) within society have differing amounts of material and non-material resources (such as the wealthy vs. the poor) and that the more powerful groups use their influence in order to exploit groups with less power. By this definition, in order for social change to occur through this source of means, someone with the best interests of the entire societyRead MoreCritical Theory, Functionalism And Symbolic Interactionism Essay1351 Words   |  6 Pagesonly one theory is applied. For that one applied theory, would only look at the aspect to which it is confined to. To successfully study sociology all three theories must be applied together. Critical theory was founded by the German philosopher Karl Marx (Little, 2016, p. 12). It was originally known as historical materialism which is â€Å"a critical analysis of capitalism that saw the material or economic basis of inequality and power relations as the cause of social instability and conflict† (LittleRead MoreConflict: Sociology and Ever-changing Nature2792 Words   |  12 PagesStrucutral functionalism is a form of  functional analysis. Functional analysis (or functionalism) is one of the major theoretical perspectives in sociology. In fact, many of the early giants of sociology, such as Spencer, Comte, and Durkheim were functionalists. Essentially, this perspective sees society as comprised of many parts that contribute in unique ways to the operation of the whole society.   The way I explain this to my class is to think of a clock. What makes a clock a clock? First,